NCER
Assistance Agreement Final Report Executive Summary
Date
of Final Report: January 1, 2009
EPA
Agreement Number: X-83254101-1
Center:
Center
for Environmental and Energy Research (CEER)
Project
Title: Tunneled Titanate
Photocatalysts for Environmental Remediation and Hydrogen Generation
Investigator(s):
Doreen
Edwards and Scott Misture
Institution(s)
of PI(s): Alfred
University
Research
Category: Congressionally
Mandated Center
Project
Period: September 1, 2006 to
February 28, 2008
Description
and Objective of Project:
Photocatalytic processes are being used for
environmental remediation and have shown promise for the production of
clean-burning hydrogen fuel. The
continued development of these technologies, particularly those which use solar
energy for photoexcitation, will require new and improved photocatalysts. In studies of BaTi4O9
and M2Ti6O13 (M = Na, K and Rb), other
researchers have suggested that structural features such as distorted TiO6
octahedra and tunnel sites may be responsible for enhanced photocatalytic
activity. In this project, six
titanate materials with different tunneled structures were investigated in an
attempt to understand the structural features that affect photocatalytic activity.
The main technical objectives
of this project were 1) to prepare tunneled titanates with different structures
(tunnel size and shape) and composition, and 2) to assess their photocatalytic
activity. Sample powders of each
composition (Na0.7Ga4.7Ti0.3O8, Na0.8Ga4.8Ti1.2O10,
Na0.8Ga4.8Ti2.2O12, K1Ga17Ti15O56,
K1.5Ga1.5Ti6.5O16, and BaTi4O9)
were prepared by solid state reaction and characterized to determine their
particle size and morphology, surface area, phase purity, and optical
properties. Ruthenium dioxide (1
weight percent) was deposited onto the surface of each powder sample using a
wet chemical method in an attempt to enhance photocatalytic activity. (Ruthenium dioxide is thought to act as
an electron acceptor for photoexcited electrodes and thereby serve as a
reduction site for the photocatalytic reactions.) The photocatalytic activity of the powders with
and without RuO2 additions was assessed using two different
methods. The first method used
optical spectroscopy to test the powdersĠ activity for decomposing a model
organic molecule, i.e. methylene blue.
The second test used gas-chromatography to measure the powdersĠ
photocatalytic ability to generate hydrogen from a water-methanol solution.
Summary
of Findings:
Six
tunneled titanate powders were prepared using solid state methods which
involved reacting oxide and carbonate starting powders at 1050-1350 oC
for up to 48 hours. The particle
size and morphology of the powders were highly dependent on processing
temperature. Powders processed at
the lower temperatures (BaTi4O9 and Na0.7Ga4.7Ti0.3O8)
had relatively small (1-2 mm
average), spherically shaped particles whereas those prepared at higher
temperatures (Na0.8Ga4.8Ti1.2O10,
Na0.8Ga4.2Ti2.2O12, K1.5Ga1.5Ti6.5O16,
and KGa17Ti15O56) had larger, angular
particles (7-25 µm average) with internal pores. As a point of comparison, the surface area of the
powders, which ranged from 0.40 to 1.58 m2/g, is relatively low
compared to that of commercial photocatalysts like Degussa P25 (>55m2/g). Ruthenium dioxide additions (1 wt%)
were made to portions of the six powders in an attempt to enhance
photocatalytic activity.
Most of the powders contained some minor
impurity phases, which were estimated to be less than 5 weight % of the total
sample based on the height of the most intense peak in the primary and minority
phases. The one exception to this
generalization is the sample prepared as Na0.8Ga4.8Ti1.2O10,
which contained significant amounts of Na0.7Ga4.7Ti0.3O8. Attempts to prepare phase-pure Na0.8Ga4.8Ti1.2O10
using different reaction temperatures and repeated heating cycles were
unsuccessful.
Most of the samples were white in color and
exhibited distinct transitions from absorption to reflection, allowing the estimation of the band gap. The K1.5Ga1.5Ti6.5O16
sample was gray and has a spectrum significantly different from the other
samples, which prevented an estimation of the band gap. With the exception of the hollandite
sample, the band gaps of the materials were similar, around 2.9 - 3.0 eV.
All prepared sample powders exhibited some
degree of photocatalytic activity.
The BaTi4O9 powder exhibited the highest activity,
decomposing 98% of the methylene blue after 6 hours of irradiation. The K1.5Ga1.5Ti6.5O16,
Na0.8Ga4.8Ti2.2O12, and KGa17Ti15O56
sample showed moderate activity, decomposing over 90% of the methylene blue after
8 hours. The Na0.7Ga4.7Ti0.3O8
and Na0.8Ga4.8Ti1.2O10 sample
powders showed marginal activity in that the concentration of methylene blue
measured after 8 hours was similar to that measured in the solution tested in
the absence of a photocatalyst. As
points of comparison, the decomposition of methylene blue in the presence of a
commercial photocatalyst was over 99% complete within 30 minutes for a sample
of equivalent weight and within 2 hours for a sample of comparable surface
area. Reducing the particle size
of the K1.5Ga1.5Ti6.5O16 sample
from 25 µm to 4 µm improved its photocatalytic activity. For most powders, the
addition of RuO2 had little effect or even decreased their
photocatalytic activity. The one
exception was found for the Na0.7Ga4.7Ti0.3O8
powders which showed a notable improvement upon the addition of 1 weight
percent (nominal) RuO2.
A reaction cell was designed and constructed to
test the photocatalytic activity of the powders for generating hydrogen from a
methanol-water solution under illumination. The RuO2-loaded BaTi4O9 had
the highest activity, producing 48 µmol per 0.1 gram of photocatalyst over a 4
hour period. The results measured
for BaTi4O9 in this study are comparable to those
reported previously by other researchers.
As a point of reference, an equivalent weight of the commercial
photocatalyst, Degussa P25 produced 4.3 µmol after four hours of
irradiation. The RuO2-free
and RuO2-loaded K1.5Ga1.5Ti6.5O16
samples produced 1.4 µmol and 2.4 µmol of hydrogen, respectively. The other tunneled titanate powders
produced less than 1 µmol during the 4 hour tests.
Conclusions:
The
tunneled titanates showed some promise as photocatalysts for decomposing a
model organic molecule and for generating hydrogen from a methanol-water
solution. Continued investigations
of the materials, and their compositional variations, are warranted. Specifically, different powder
processing methods aimed at achieving submicron (high surface area) powders is
recommended. Additionally, improved
coating methods for achieving controlled distribution of RuO2 on the
surface should be explored.
Publications/Presentations:
S. B. Sanford, J.
Ovenstone, S. T. Misture, and D. D.
Edwards, Tunneled titanate
photocatalysts for environmental remediation and hydrogen generation, Annual
Meeting of the American Ceramic Society at Materials Science and Technology,
Detroit, MI, September 16-20, 2007
S. B. Sanford, J. W.
Amoroso, S. T. Misture, and D. D. Edwards, Screening of Tunneled Titanate
Photocatalysts for Environmental Remediation and Hydrogen Generation, Fall
Meeting of the Materials Research Society, Boston, MA, 2006
Supplemental
Key Words:
tunneled
titanates, photocatalysts, photocatalysis, titanium dioxide, hollandite,
beta-gallia rutile intergrowths, hydrogen generation
Relevant
Web Sites:
http://ceer.alfred.edu